SiPAT logo

SiPAT

Negotiated Procurement for Non-Similar Adjacent Project

National Housing Authority · 2024

Severity: HighRecommendation: Unknown

This summary was generated automatically from the source document and may contain errors. It is not an official interpretation and should not be relied upon as legal guidance. Review the original excerpt and source document to verify before citing or acting on it.

What Happened?

Category: ProcurementIssue: Non-compliance

The agency used a special procurement method to hire a contractor for a housing project, but the contractor was already doing a different kind of project (a footbridge) nearby, and the rules only allow this if the projects are similar.

Why It Matters

Recommended Actions

No recommendations are available for this finding yet.

Original Audit Finding Excerpt

"The rehabilitation of the concrete footbridge is neither similar nor related to the scope of works for the construction of 81 units of Houses on Stilts. Hence, the use of the negotiated procurement method casts doubt on the reasonableness and defeats the purpose of competitive bidding, potentially compromising transparency, fairness, and procurement of infrastructure projects at the most advantageous price for the government."

Source Document

11-NHA2024_Part2-Observations_and_Recomm.doc

2024 AAR · 14 files