SiPAT logo

SiPAT

Contractor permitted to commence construction without proper authorization

National Housing Authority · 2024

Severity: HighRecommendation: Unknown

This summary was generated automatically from the source document and may contain errors. It is not an official interpretation and should not be relied upon as legal guidance. Review the original excerpt and source document to verify before citing or acting on it.

What Happened?

Category: ComplianceIssue: Non-compliance

The agency allowed a contractor to start building a 12-storey commercial/office building without the necessary approvals, which is a violation of proper procedures.

Why It Matters

Recommended Actions

No recommendations are available for this finding yet.

Original Audit Finding Excerpt

"Ayency Action Plan Reason for - Target implementation Partial/Delay/ - ; Ref. Audit Observations Audit Recommendations Action Plan Person/Dept. 2 Date Status of Non- Action Taken/Action to be Taken Responsible Implementation | Implementatio From To n, if applicable b. Coordinate with the concerned LGUs and demand for the return of unused balances particularly those accounts that are dormant; and Implemented Reg 13: As of July 31, 2025, RO received an updated SORD from LGU-San Francisco reflecting the final disbursement and remaining balance amounting to P4,523,913.63 then subsequently refunded the unexpended balance of P0.61 to RO for the San Francisco Mamanwa Tribai Village. The RO will send the updated SORD to the AD of the said project, upon completion of gathering of documents and deposit of unexpended balance. b. Reg 1: The DO scheduled a joint inspection with the concerned offices for the final quantification. It also prepared the amendment to the MOA and submitted it to th"

Source Document

NHA2024_AAPSI.pdf

2024 AAR · 14 files