SiPAT logo

SiPAT

Submitted Contracts with Deficient Supporting Documents

Department of Public Works and Highways · 2024

Severity: HighRecommendation: Unknown

This summary was generated automatically from the source document and may contain errors. It is not an official interpretation and should not be relied upon as legal guidance. Review the original excerpt and source document to verify before citing or acting on it.

What Happened?

Category: Compliance and ReportingIssue: Non-compliance

Even when contracts were sent to the auditor, many had missing or incomplete paperwork, such as no proper signatures, insufficient security bonds, or photocopied financial documents, which weakens the reliability of the procurement process.

Why It Matters

Recommended Actions

No recommendations are available for this finding yet.

Original Audit Finding Excerpt

"On the other hand, 372 of the contracts submitted were with deficiencies such as non-issuance of Supplemental Bid Bulletin, insufficient amount posted Performance Securit ies, unsigned Bill of Quantities, submission of photocopied financial documents, doubtful Net Financing Contracting Capacity, no Conforme & Date by Supplier, Date/Period of Delivery and duplicate number of P O."

Source Document

09-DPWH2024_Part2-Observations_and_Recomm.pdf

2024 AAR · 13 files