Incomplete and unsigned BP Forms in funding requests
Department of Public Works and Highways · 2024
This summary was generated automatically from the source document and may contain errors. It is not an official interpretation and should not be relied upon as legal guidance. Review the original excerpt and source document to verify before citing or acting on it.
What Happened?
Category: DocumentationIssue: Non-complianceThe district office submitted forms that were missing important information like the project dates and approval. Some forms were also not signed by the responsible officials, so they are not valid. This could delay or invalidate the funding request.
Why It Matters
Recommended Actions
No recommendations are available for this finding yet.
Original Audit Finding Excerpt
"The supporting documents submitted with the funding requests, as required under Item 1 of DO No. 23, series of 2015, were all attached. However, these documents lacked critical information necessary for the approval of the requests. Among the supporting documents, the BP Forms 202 were the most deficient, missing key details such as the implementation period of the projects and the dates of approval. More significantly, six of these forms were neither signed by the officials preparing the forms nor approved by the head of the agency, raising concerns about their validity."